Simon Bakewell Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 (edited) I’ll start off! What do we think of very bright blue images like this one? Too bright and not very realistic? Edited September 27 by Simon Bakewell 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andre B. Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 I would always say its a matter of taste. I always try to balance mids,highs and lows and in the end apply the correct saturation. In this image I feel like it would be great to rebalance those 3 (mids, highs, lows) Try to get the brightness down of the whole image and then balance them. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Bakewell Posted September 28 Author Share Posted September 28 Thanks for this 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Navin Singh Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 Realistic, no! Beautiful, yes! For printing a wall photo I would prefer this image. For observing the very fine details of the nebula in appropriate manner I will resort to normal saturation version. Maybe it would have been slightly more natural if you had streched the frame a bit more with lower saturation boost, but I love it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim DeLillo Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 Art or science? In science, you have to be accurate or try to reproduce the color in the correct wavelengths and intensity. If art, just let it fly. You're the master of the final image. If YOU like it, what else matters? ~Jim 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now